In Defense of Aristotle Laws of Thought Avi Sion 9781495939303 Books
Download As PDF : In Defense of Aristotle Laws of Thought Avi Sion 9781495939303 Books
In Defense of Aristotle’s Laws of Thought addresses, from a phenomenological standpoint, numerous modern and Buddhist objections and misconceptions regarding the basic principles of Aristotelian logic. Many people seem to be attacking Aristotle’s Laws of Thought nowadays, some coming from the West and some from the East. It is important to review and refute such ideas as they arise.
In Defense of Aristotle Laws of Thought Avi Sion 9781495939303 Books
This book provides an outstanding analysis of Aristotle's three laws of thought:1) A thing is what it is (the law of identity).
2) A thing cannot at once be and not-be (the law of non-contradiction).
3) A thing cannot neither be nor not-be (the law of the excluded middle).
As Sion makes clear, these laws are not arbitrary, and any attempt to deny their axiomatic primacy in the practice of logic (non-contradictory identification of the facts of reality) is fanciful. Sion writes:
"The validity of logic is thus itself an inductive truth, not some arbitrary axiom. Logic is credible, because it describes how we actually proceed to distinguish truth from falsehood in knowledge derived from experience. No other logic than the standard logic of the three laws of thought is possible, because any attempt to fancifully propose any other logic inevitably gets judged through standard logic. The three laws of thought are always our ultimate norms of discursive conduct and judgment. They point us to an ideal of knowledge we constantly try to emulate."
Sion properly rips both the postmodern sophists (such as Wittgenstein and Heidegger) and the more ancient ones (such as Nagarjuna), who argue that rationality is arbitrary or involves circularity or infinite regression. He also explains why "fuzzy logic" does not negate Aristotelean logic. This text demonstrates Sion's strength as a philosopher - his deep understanding of epistemology, phenomenology, and logic - and his weakness: his limited grasp of ontology and spiritual mysticism.
Sion, a practicing Jew who is also deeply into Buddhism, informs us that "to be an effective logician first, then, one must learn `meditation'..." But then he rips irrational, contradiction-riddled Buddhist philosophy without explaining why this meditation-intensive religion produced and subscribed to illogical metaphysics and epistemology. The Randian term for this is "blank out."
Sion writes: "Initially, this analogy to water seems to call for a universal underlying substance -an assumed "ether." But as Einstein pointed out, since the velocity of light is the same in all directions and displays no Doppler effect, there can be no ether! Thus all is one and one is nothing! This interesting discourse of modern science seems to confirm the much older Buddhist view that the universal ocean is one of Emptiness (Shunyata). Judaism also has this notion of the All as originally Nothingness."
Sion need to reread Ayn Rand. He's guilty of the reification of zero and buying into the absurd ex nihilo notion that something can come from nothing. Also, the 1920 book "Ether and the Theory of Relativity" (quoted in Wikipedia.org, under Aether Theories) hardly seconds his viewpoint regarding the ether:
"We may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an aether. According to the general theory of relativity space without aether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this aether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it."
In summary, "In Defense of Aristotle's Laws of Thought," Sion provides an excellent defense of Aristotelian logic, but when he ventures into ontology and spiritual mysticism, he reveals his limitations as a philosopher.
Product details
|
Tags : In Defense of Aristotle's Laws of Thought [Avi Sion] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In Defense of Aristotle’s Laws of Thought addresses, from a phenomenological standpoint, numerous modern and Buddhist objections and misconceptions regarding the basic principles of Aristotelian logic. Many people seem to be attacking Aristotle’s Laws of Thought nowadays,Avi Sion,In Defense of Aristotle's Laws of Thought,CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform,1495939308,Education : General,EducationGeneral,Logic,PHILOSOPHY Logic,Philosophy,Philosophy: logic
People also read other books :
- The Juice Fasting Bible Discover the Power of an All-Juice Diet to Restore Good Health, Lose Weight and Increase Vitality - edition by Sandra Cabot. Health, Fitness & Dieting eBooks @ .
- Second Sight eBook Lynn Michaels
- Zodiac Code Solved! Confession of the Zodiac Killer eBook Michael D. Sechrest, Tom Voigt
- Who Let the Mongoose Loose? William H. Tyler 9781426956942 Books
- The Wise Owl Guide To... Dantes Subject Standardized Test (DSST) Substance Abuse (Formerly Drug and Alcohol Abuse) Second Edition Wise Owl Publications LLC 9781440486531 Books
In Defense of Aristotle Laws of Thought Avi Sion 9781495939303 Books Reviews
This book provides an outstanding analysis of Aristotle's three laws of thought
1) A thing is what it is (the law of identity).
2) A thing cannot at once be and not-be (the law of non-contradiction).
3) A thing cannot neither be nor not-be (the law of the excluded middle).
As Sion makes clear, these laws are not arbitrary, and any attempt to deny their axiomatic primacy in the practice of logic (non-contradictory identification of the facts of reality) is fanciful. Sion writes
"The validity of logic is thus itself an inductive truth, not some arbitrary axiom. Logic is credible, because it describes how we actually proceed to distinguish truth from falsehood in knowledge derived from experience. No other logic than the standard logic of the three laws of thought is possible, because any attempt to fancifully propose any other logic inevitably gets judged through standard logic. The three laws of thought are always our ultimate norms of discursive conduct and judgment. They point us to an ideal of knowledge we constantly try to emulate."
Sion properly rips both the postmodern sophists (such as Wittgenstein and Heidegger) and the more ancient ones (such as Nagarjuna), who argue that rationality is arbitrary or involves circularity or infinite regression. He also explains why "fuzzy logic" does not negate Aristotelean logic. This text demonstrates Sion's strength as a philosopher - his deep understanding of epistemology, phenomenology, and logic - and his weakness his limited grasp of ontology and spiritual mysticism.
Sion, a practicing Jew who is also deeply into Buddhism, informs us that "to be an effective logician first, then, one must learn `meditation'..." But then he rips irrational, contradiction-riddled Buddhist philosophy without explaining why this meditation-intensive religion produced and subscribed to illogical metaphysics and epistemology. The Randian term for this is "blank out."
Sion writes "Initially, this analogy to water seems to call for a universal underlying substance -an assumed "ether." But as Einstein pointed out, since the velocity of light is the same in all directions and displays no Doppler effect, there can be no ether! Thus all is one and one is nothing! This interesting discourse of modern science seems to confirm the much older Buddhist view that the universal ocean is one of Emptiness (Shunyata). Judaism also has this notion of the All as originally Nothingness."
Sion need to reread Ayn Rand. He's guilty of the reification of zero and buying into the absurd ex nihilo notion that something can come from nothing. Also, the 1920 book "Ether and the Theory of Relativity" (quoted in Wikipedia.org, under Aether Theories) hardly seconds his viewpoint regarding the ether
"We may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an aether. According to the general theory of relativity space without aether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this aether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it."
In summary, "In Defense of Aristotle's Laws of Thought," Sion provides an excellent defense of Aristotelian logic, but when he ventures into ontology and spiritual mysticism, he reveals his limitations as a philosopher.
0 Response to "∎ PDF Free In Defense of Aristotle Laws of Thought Avi Sion 9781495939303 Books"
Post a Comment